Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297160›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Related factors affecting misdiagnosis of aortic dissection: a single-center retrospective study.

Sheng Wang, Liu Yang, Tao Hu, Hui Deng, Weiling Tu, Yijie Wu, Linfeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sheng Wang *Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Liu Yang *Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Tao HuJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Hui DengJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Weiling TuJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yijie WuJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Linfeng LiJiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. Delayed diagnosis frequently leads to treatment delays, elevated mortality, and complications. This study investigates the factors contributing to the misdiagnosis of AD and proposes strategies for improving its early diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 801 patients with AD identified 219 cases for inclusion, which were split into a training set (131 cases) and a validation set (88 cases). A binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors influencing misdiagnosis, while a Nomogram prediction model was developed. Results: The analysis revealed that factors such as the timing and suddenness of symptom onset, typical back pain, walk-in clinic visits, and laboratory results (D-dimer, fibrinogen, and white blood count) were significant in predicting misdiagnosis. The Nomogram model showed high predictive accuracy with an Area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.924 in the training set and 0.912 in the validation set, demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity. Conclusion: The model offers potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes in AD cases.

Indexed as

aortic dissectiondiagnosis challengemisdiagnosispredictive modelingrisk factorsrisk factors aortic dissection

Identifiers

PMID40297160
PMCPMC12034686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.