ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Off-label drug use in China after the Physician Law (2021): legal challenges and solutions.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Off-label use catalogue of tumor anti-angiogenic drugs in China: a narrative review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In 2021 China enacted the Physician Law, which specifically outlines the legal requirements for off-label drug use in Article 29. Legislators, medical institutions, and judicial authorities all hoped that this new regulation would effectively reduce illegal off-label drug use. However, many violations still occurred in medical practice even after the enactment of the Physician Law, leading to judicial cases. This article examines the current state of off-label drug use in China, and the legal liability risks faced by medical institutions. Methods: This study investigates data from two main aspects: (1) judicial decisions related to off-label drug use; and (2) surveys associated with off-label drug use from medical institutions. Systematic literature search and descriptive data analysis was conducted in this paper. Results: This article identifies three main forms of non-compliant off-label drug use: first, insufficient evidence-based justification; second, deficiencies in the informed consent process; and third, the lack of an internal review system. These are also the primary factors leading to legal liability for medical institutions. Discussion: From a legal doctrinal perspective, the article concludes by elaborating on how each legal requirement should be met. Our research provides insights into the factors that lead to legal liability for off-label drug use and examines how physicians and medical institutions can avoid such liability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.