Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297101›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

Individuals Frequently Search Google With Questions About the Management of Meniscal Tears and the Indications for and Technical Details of Surgery but the Quality of the Information Is Suboptimal.

Jonathan Spaan, John Streepy, Alexander Hodakowski, Amelia Hummel, Colton Mowers, Sabrina Schundler, Johnathon R McCormick, Jonathan Riboh, Dana Piasecki, Jorge Chahla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonathan SpaanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
John StreepyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Alexander HodakowskiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Amelia HummelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Colton MowersDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Sabrina SchundlerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Johnathon R McCormickDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Jonathan RibohOrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Dana PiaseckiOrthoCarolina Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the frequently asked questions that patients search online regarding meniscal tears and meniscal surgery and evaluate the quality of websites used to answer these common queries. Methods: This study used Google's People Also Ask function to extract the most common 300 questions and associated Web pages regarding meniscal tears and meniscal surgery. Questions on both meniscal tear and meniscal surgery were categorized using the Rothwell classification, and websites were evaluated with Results: The Rothwell classification of questions on meniscal tear/surgery was 54.0%/55% fact, 37.7%/30.0% policy, and 8.3%/15.0% value. The meniscal tear cohort asked significantly more questions related to policy ( Conclusions: The quality of online information related to meniscal tears and surgery is often suboptimal based on objective measures of value. Individuals frequently search for insights into indications, management, and technical details. Clinical Relevance: Understanding common themes in online searches can provide valuable insights that could improve patient education. Surgeons can use this information to anticipate potential questions, establish appropriate patient expectations, and enhance informed decisions.

Identifiers

PMID40297101
PMCPMC12034050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.