Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297097›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

Patient-Reported Outcomes Differentially Worsen in Patients With Greater Obesity Classes After Hip Arthroscopy.

Gregory Perraut, Madison Thompson, Emily Krisanda, Seleem Elkadi, Shankar Thiru, Danny Chamaa, Evan Michaelson, William Postma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gregory PerrautDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Madison ThompsonDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Emily KrisandaDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Seleem ElkadiDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Shankar ThiruDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Danny ChamaaDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Evan MichaelsonDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.
William PostmaDepartment of Orthopedics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the association between obesity classification and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in hip arthroscopy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent hip arthroscopy and completed at least 1 preoperative and corresponding postoperative PRO-the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog pain scale (VAS), or Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12)-between December 2018 and August 2023. Exclusion criteria included previous ipsilateral hip surgery, incomplete or missing PROs, missing body mass index (BMI) data, follow-up <2 weeks, inflammatory arthritis, hip dysplasia, or avascular necrosis. Nonobesity was defined as BMI <30 and obesity as BMI ≥30, further classified as class I/II (BMI 30-40) or class III (BMI ≥40). Significance was set at alpha = 0.05. Results: In total, 349 cases were included in this study. Average BMI was 25.87 and age was 34.42 years. 65% of patients were female. In total, 288 patients (82.5%) did not have obesity and 61 patients (17.5%) had obesity. In the obesity group, 3 patients (4.9%) were defined as having class III obesity. Compared with baseline, patients without obesity demonstrated significant improvements across all 4 PROs at every time point. Similarly, patients classified with class I/II obesity showed significant improvement in the VAS, HHS, and VR-12 Physical but not in the VR-12 Mental score. Patients with class III obesity did not experience any improvement in PROs after 4 weeks and had significantly worse scores compared with both patients with class I/II obesity and patients without obesity at every time point. Conclusions: Although patients without obesity consistently demonstrated significant improvements across all 4 PROs, outcomes for patients with obesity varied depending on the severity of obesity. Patients with class I/II obesity showed intermittent improvements, with significant gains in some PROs but not all. In contrast, patients with class III obesity did not experience any significant lasting improvements in outcomes after hip arthroscopy. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Identifiers

PMID40297097
PMCPMC12034063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.