ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025
Semiautomated Three-Dimensional Landmark Placement on Knee Models Is a Reliable Method to Describe Bone Shape and Alignment.
Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07472088 (Assessing the Association Between WBCT PFJ Morphological Metrics and Knee Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessing the Association Between WBCT PFJ Morphological Metrics and Knee Symptoms
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3-D landmarking repeatability emphasizes challenges in scan positioning during weight bearing CT of the knee.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2026Article
- Breaking down tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance into two components to enable patient-specific treatment strategies.Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine · 2026Article
- Measures of Patellofemoral Morphology Predict the Risk of Local Cartilage Damage Progression: A Yale/MOST Collaborative Study.The American journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Three-Dimensional Tibial Tubercle Transfer Planning.Video journal of sports medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the inter- and intrarater reliability of 21 anatomical landmarks initially placed with an artificial intelligence algorithm and then manually verified with human input. Methods: Thirty computed tomography scans of the knees of participants from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) ages 45 to 55 years were included. Approximately one-half experienced progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis, defined as an increased cartilage score in the patellofemoral compartment on magnetic resonance imaging over 2 years. The algorithm automatically placed 19 anatomic landmarks on the femur, tibia, and patella. An additional 2 landmarks were added manually. Two landmark reviewers separately reviewed all 30 scans and verified all landmarks. After 2 weeks, one reviewer repeated the process for the same dataset. The mean Euclidean distance of manual landmark displacement, mean absolute disagreement between and within raters, and intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intrarater reliability were calculated. Results: All landmarks had excellent inter-rater reliability. The tibial and femoral shaft centers had intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 1, indicating their positions did not differ. Seventeen landmarks had ICCs between 0.90 and 0.99 and the tibial tuberosity had an ICC of 0.87. Intrarater reliability scores were 1 for 16 landmarks and between 0.90 and 0.99 for the remaining 5. Conclusions: There was excellent agreement on the locations of all 21 landmarks evaluated in this study. Clinical Relevance: The potential role of artificial intelligence in medical imaging and orthopaedic research is a growing area of interest. The excellent reliability demonstrated across multiple landmarks in our study reveals the potential for semiautomated 3-dimensional methods to enhance precision of anatomical measurements of the knee over 2-dimensional methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.