Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297083›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2025

External Fixator Application, 2-Stage Procedures, and Postoperative Infection Risk Are Higher in Multiligamentous Knee Injuries After Frank Knee Dislocations.

Adam V Daniel, Taylor A Johnson, Katherine F Druskovich, Warren A Williams, Daniel Miller, Stanley J Kupiszewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation and Management of Knee Dislocations in Low-income Settings: Evidence-based Strategies and Practical Considerations.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam V DanielOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
Taylor A JohnsonOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
Katherine F DruskovichOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
Warren A WilliamsOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
Daniel MillerOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.
Stanley J KupiszewskiOrlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To examine outcomes after surgical treatment of multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) in patients with dislocated versus non-dislocated knees. Methods: Patients who were surgically treated for MLKIs between 2008 and 2021 were included in this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with a frank knee dislocation (KD), diagnosed by radiographs or reduction notes in the emergency department, and those without a frank KD (non-KD). The following patient-reported outcome measures were collected: visual analog scale for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, and Lysholm knee scoring scale. Additional procedures such as revision ligamentous reconstruction and complications such as infection and arthrofibrosis were also obtained. Results: A total of 88 patients (88 knees; 36 KD vs 52 non-KD) were included in the final analysis. This study included 30 female and 58 male patients, and the mean age was 34.3 ± 12.7 years (range, 10-61 years). The mean follow-up period for the patients who did not receive revision surgery was 9.2 years (range, 3.4-15.3 years). There were no differences in age, sex, mechanism of injury, meniscal/chondral injury, or neurovascular status between the groups. Furthermore, there were no differences in visual analog scale, International Knee Documentation Committee, or Lysholm scores. Significantly more patients in the KD group showed higher KD grades (KD III-KD V, 29 [81%] vs 21 [40%]; Conclusions: Patients who experienced frank KDs showed an increased odds of receiving external fixation, showed an increased odds of undergoing a staged procedure, had higher grades of injury, and had a higher risk of postoperative infection compared with those without KDs. At final follow-up, no differences in patient-reported outcomes were noted between the 2 groups. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Identifiers

PMID40297083
PMCPMC12034051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.