ArticleWearable technologies2025
Evaluation of the static and dynamic assistive torque of a passive upper limb occupational exoskeleton.
Article in Wearable technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multimodal EEG-EMG and FEM-Based Adaptive Control of Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeletons.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjusting the assistive torque of upper limb occupational exoskeletons is essential to optimize their effectiveness and user acceptance in companies. This adjustment enables a balance to be struck between the expected benefits and potential undesirable effects associated with their use, particularly for the shoulder joint, which is sensitive to the balance of forces. Despite this, no study has yet evaluated these assistive torques in static and dynamic conditions representative of work situations. The aim of this article is therefore to evaluate these assistive torques under these two conditions, using an isokinetic dynamometer. Angular velocities ranging from 0 to 240°/s and four levels of assistance were investigated. The results showed that the maximum assistive torques in flexion (energy restitution phase) were lower than those in extension (tensioning phase) by 20 to 36% and were median in static conditions. It was also observed that the level of assistance and the exoskeleton opening angles had a strong impact on the assistive torques, unlike the angular velocity in dynamic conditions, which had a minimal effect. Quantifying these assistive torques is crucial for assessing their biomechanical impact and adjusting the exoskeleton's assistance to the operator and the task performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.