ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
A New Predictive Parameter for Rotator Cuff Tears: Acromial Incidence Angle.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Osseous Shoulder Morphology and Pathoanatomical Characteristics of Calcific Deposits in Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A significant statistical association of increased critical shoulder angle (CSA) with rotator cuff tear (RCT) has been demonstrated; however, the mean difference between RCT and control groups varies between approximately 1° and 3.5°, with a wide range of distribution of the CSA from 18° to 55°. It may be more predictive to evaluate the CSA in conjunction with parameters that evaluate the morphology of the acromion in the sagittal plane. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that the acromial incidence angle (AIA), which can evaluate the position and orientation of the acromion in the sagittal plane, may be associated with RCT and that AIA, when evaluated together with the CSA, may provide a highly predictive measure of risk for RCT. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The study included 117 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for posterosuperior RCT and 117 patients as a control group. The CSA, AIA, glenoid inclination, glenoid version, and anterior acromial coverage were measured on magnetic resonance imaging. The groups were compared in terms of these parameters. Results: The mean CSA was significantly higher in the RCT group (35.7°± 5.3°) than in the control group (33.9°± 4.5°), with a sensitivity of 57.1% and a specificity of 61.3% ( Conclusion: The AIA predicted RCT with a sensitivity of 80.2% and a specificity of 83.9% for values >70°. In patients with a CSA of <35°, it predicted RCT, with a sensitivity of 85.6% and a specificity of 84.8% at values >72°. By evaluating the relationship between the acromion and the glenoid in the sagittal plane, the AIA, as a novel parameter, allows for the reevaluation of the risk in the patient group with a CSA of <35°, which is considered to be in the low-risk category in terms of RCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.