ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Incidental Findings on Preoperative Computed Tomography for Hip Arthroscopy.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MCID normalization: A methodological framework for harmonizing heterogeneous PROMs in hip arthroscopy research.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients routinely undergo computed tomography (CT) before arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement as part of preoperative planning. These scans include the lower lumbar spine, entire pelvis, proximal femur, knees, and ankles, raising questions about the prevalence and clinical impact of incidental findings (IFs) from these images. Purpose: To evaluate factors associated with IFs, as well as their prevalence, management, and impact on patient outcomes. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a retrospective review of preoperative pelvic CT scans from a single surgeon's hip outcomes registry. Additional details regarding specific participants were obtained through electronic medical records. Logistic regression analysis was used to compare the effects of predictors of interest on the likelihood of having an IF on CT imaging. Repeated-measures mixed modeling was utilized to examine the effect of IFs on patient-reported outcomes obtained at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Results: A total of 714 preoperative CT reports in 596 patients were reviewed; IFs were present in 306 of the scans (42.9%). Most IFs were of skeletal pathology (78.1%), followed by soft tissue (7.8%), reproductive (6.9%), abdominal (4.2%), and urologic (2.9%). Of the 306 IFs, 10 (3.3%) required further medical workup. Multivariate analysis indicated that patient factors associated with an IF included age ( Conclusion: The presence of IFs on CT imaging was associated with significant decreases across multiple outcome scores; however, the differences in scores did not exceed the MCID for any outcome. The high prevalence of IFs necessitates implementation of a reliable standardized follow-up protocol. This could improve overall patient care by reassuring patients of benign findings or providing treatment for potentially harmful ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.