Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40297031›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Immigration policy as public health policy: Trump's first administration and a critical public health response to the second.

Claudia M Calhoon, Sirry M Alang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudia M CalhoonGraduate School of Public Health and Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.
Sirry M AlangHealth and Human Development, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although President Trump was unable to pass new immigration laws in his first administration, he successfully employed executive orders, rulemaking, and administrative practices that altered significant policies, including benefits programs, immigration enforcement, and criteria for admissibility to the United States. The public health consequences of immigration policies under Trump's first presidency, deeply punitive immigration policies at the forefront of his 2024 presidential campaign, and far-reaching executive orders that have characterized the early days of his second term present important challenges to practitioners. Arriving at a consensus about how public health institutions respond to political health determinants has become more urgent as increasingly restrictive and punitive immigration policies are proposed and implemented. Critical perspectives that explore the role of power in policy development, implementation, and impact, such as critical race theory, can help public health practitioners do this. We discuss the 45th administration's immigration policies in terms of colorblindness and race-consciousness, whiteness and entitlement, interest convergence, and the ubiquity of racism. We show how these policies extend dangerously into the current 47th presidency. The impacts of restrictive and punitive immigration policies, as well as the continuous desensitization of the public to extreme approaches, require critical public health responses.

Indexed as

Emigration and ImmigrationHealth PolicyPoliticsPublic HealthPublic PolicyHumansPolicy MakingUnited Statescritical public healthequityimmigrationimmigration policyracism

Identifiers

PMID40297031
PMCPMC12034670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.