ArticleRSC advances2025
Hole transport layer selection for stable and efficient carbon electrode-based perovskite solar cells.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic Graphene Polishing Enabling van der Waals Anchors for Efficient and Robust Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Cells.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Balancing Efficiency, Stability, Scalability, and Sustainability in Hybrid Perovskite Solar Cells: A Comprehensive Review.ACS omega · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perovskite solar cell (PSC) technology has achieved remarkable progress, with champion power conversion efficiencies (PCE) exceeding 26%. However, the long-term stability of PSCs remains a significant barrier to their widespread commercialization. Carbon-based PSCs (C-PSCs) have gained attention as a promising cost-effective and scalable production solution, replacing expensive metal electrodes and offering improved stability. Despite these advantages, C-PSCs face challenges in matching the performance of noble metal-based PSCs, particularly in terms of carrier extraction efficiency and reduced carrier recombination at the carbon/perovskite interface. The selection of hole transport materials (HTMs) is crucial for optimizing this interface, but comprehensive studies on HTM selection for C-PSCs are limited. This study systematically investigated three commonly used hole transport layers (HTLs): Spiro-OMeTAD, CuSCN, and PTAA. Our results show that Spiro-OMeTAD-based C-PSCs exhibit the best overall performance, achieving a PCE of 19.29%. CuSCN-based devices, while lower in efficiency (11.94% PCE), demonstrated superior stability, retaining approximately 60% of their initial performance after 500 hours under ambient conditions. PTAA-based devices achieved a PCE of 12.92% but exhibited significant degradation, maintaining only ∼35% of their original efficiency over the same duration. These findings highlight the importance of selecting HTLs that balance performance and stability and emphasize the need for further optimization to enhance the commercial viability of C-PSCs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.