ArticleCureus2025
Multiple Giant Stones in an Augmented Bladder: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder stones are a common finding in urology practice although they are less common when compared to kidney and ureteral stones. This case report involves a male patient in his 40s with multiple giant bladder stones. The patient had neurogenic bladder disease due to spina bifida and had a history of bladder augmentation with continent urinary diversion when he was a child. He presented with difficulty in emptying bladder with clean intermittent catheterization. Open cystolithotomy was performed and six giant stones, five pyramid-shaped stones and a cube-shaped stone with a maximum diameter of 7 cm, were removed from the bladder. In our opinion, the rare occurrence of a high stone burden, stone weight and size, and geometric shapes of stones makes this case interesting. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 10th day after the surgery and there were no postoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.