ArticleCureus2025
Comprehensive Quantification of Collagen, Elastin, and Glycosaminoglycans in the Human Facial Dermis: Insights From a Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Exosome Injection with or without Low Level Laser Therapy Promotes Skin Wound Healing: An Experimental Study.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Benchmarking of Decellularization Protocols for Small Intestinal Submucosa: Defining the Gold Standard for Functional Tissue Engineering.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Regenerative Therapies for Cosmetic Dermatology for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Skin Aging, Aesthetic Concerns, and Evidence-Based Best Practices.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Age-related alterations in the dermal extracellular matrix (ECM) drive skin aging and are linked to numerous dermatological conditions, including diminished wound healing and compromised skin integrity. Our study aims to quantify and compare the distribution of collagen, elastic fibers, and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) across different ages and analyze their patterns in vertical sections of the facial dermis. Methods Skin samples were collected from the under-eye (UE) and forehead (FH) regions of 24 male and female human cadavers aged 59-87. Samples were processed histologically. Collagen, elastic fibers, and GAG content were stained using trichrome, van Gieson, and alcian blue stains, respectively. The data was collected using ImageJ software. Two-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test was used to analyze differences across regions and stain types. Results The FH region showed significantly higher GAGs in horizontal sections compared to vertical (p < 0.0001), with no significant differences in collagen (p = 0.9968) or elastic fibers (p = 0.8762). In the UE region, GAGs were also higher in horizontal sections (p = 0.0001), while collagen (p = 0.3954) and elastic fibers (p > 0.9999) showed no differences. Comparing FH and UE, vertical sections showed significant differences in collagen (p = 0.021) and GAGs (p = 0.0027), with higher values in FH. Horizontal sections showed significantly higher GAGs in FH (p = 0.001), with no differences in collagen (p = 0.5709) or elastic fibers (p > 0.9999). ECM changes were significant with age, but no differences were observed based on gender. Conclusions These findings offer novel insights into the structural and functional differences in the facial dermis, which can inform targeted anti-aging treatments, improve strategies for wound healing, and guide personalized dermatological interventions for skin integrity and rejuvenation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.