Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40296934›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Does Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach Improve Quality of Life of Orthodontic Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion? A Systematic Review Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Guidelines.

Ahmed S Khalil, Rawan S Alrehaili, Mohammed Bajunaid, Mohammed Alhazmi, Abdullah Alshami, Badr Alharthy, Omar Fakhry, Yara Olfat, Abdulkader Taher, Razan Alotaibi and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ahmed S KhalilOrthodontics, Private Practice, Medina, SAU.
Rawan S AlrehailiDentistry, Private Practice, Medina, SAU.
Mohammed BajunaidCollege of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Mohammed AlhazmiCollege of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdullah AlshamiCollege of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Badr AlharthyCollege of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Omar FakhryCollege of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Yara OlfatCollege of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulkader TaherCollege of Dentistry, Batterjee Medical College, Jeddah, SAU.
Razan AlotaibiCollege of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Maryam AlrefaiDentistry, Ministry of Health, Al Hofuf, SAU.
Abdulaziz A BarashidOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgery-first approach has gained popularity in recent years due to its ability to bypass the presurgical orthodontic phase and significantly reduce treatment duration. However, its broader impact on quality of life and psychosocial outcomes in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion has not been systematically evaluated. This systematic review aimed to assess the effects of the surgery-first approach on quality of life, psychosocial outcomes, and treatment duration in this patient population. The review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases identified studies evaluating the surgery-first approach in skeletal class III patients. Studies addressing the impact of this approach on quality of life, psychosocial outcomes, and treatment duration were included, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and outcomes, a narrative synthesis of the data was performed. A total of eight studies, conducted between 2015 and 2022, with 252 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The surgery-first approach demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life, particularly in the early postoperative stages, while avoiding the decline typically observed during the presurgical phase of the conventional orthodontics-first approach. Psychosocial benefits, such as reduced anxiety and enhanced self-esteem, were consistently reported. Treatment duration for the surgery-first approach ranged from 7 to 15 months, significantly shorter than the conventional approach. However, the strength of the evidence was limited by small sample sizes and a lack of randomization in most studies. The surgery-first approach offers distinct advantages for skeletal class III patients, including improved quality of life, enhanced psychosocial outcomes, and shorter treatment duration compared to the conventional orthodontics-first protocol. Nevertheless, further high-quality randomized clinical studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and ensure treatment stability.

Indexed as

class iii malocclusionmandibular setbackmaxillary advancementorthodonticsorthognathic surgerypsychosocial outcomesquality of lifesurgery-first approach

Identifiers

PMID40296934
PMCPMC12037207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.