ReviewBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Advancements in systemic therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review from the beginning to the latest updates.
Review in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical complete response as a surrogate for pathological response in bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BJU international · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive and advanced bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Assessing clinical complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond staging: toward a layered risk architecture after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Grading of bladder cancer: updates, controversies and practical solutions.Histopathology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Several phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the importance of perioperative systemic therapy, especially for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Objective: To synthesize the growing evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for MIBC utilizing the data from RCTs. Evidence acquisition: Three databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in October 2024 for eligible RCTs evaluating oncologic outcomes in MIBC patients treated with systemic therapy. We evaluated pathological complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis: Thirty-three RCTs (including 14 ongoing trials) were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improved OS compared to radical cystectomy alone. Particularly, the VESPER trial demonstrated that dd-MVAC provided oncological benefits over GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.71), and PFS (HR: 0.70). Recently, the NIAGARA trial showed that perioperative durvalumab plus GC outperformed GC alone in terms of pCR rates, OS (HR: 0.75), and EFS (HR: 0.68). Despite the lack of data on overall AE rates in the VESPER trial, differential safety profiles in hematologic toxicity were reported between dd-MVAC and durvalumab plus GC regimens. In the adjuvant setting, no study provided the OS benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, only adjuvant nivolumab had significant DFS and OS benefits compared to placebo. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains the current standard of care for MIBC. Durvalumab shed light on the promising impact of ICIs added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nivolumab is the only ICI recommended as adjuvant therapy in patients who harbored adverse pathologic outcomes. Ongoing trials will provide further information on the impact of combination therapy, including chemotherapy, ICIs, and enfortumab vedotin, in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.