Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40296784›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Clinical evaluation of MyoCare in Europe (CEME) for myopia management: One-year results.

Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina, Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena, Cesar Villa-Collar, Clara Martinez-Perez, Beatriz de Corcuera-Terrero, Nicole Liu, Wayne Li, Padmaja Sankaridurg, Arne Ohlendorf, Clinical Evaluation of MyoCare in Europe – the CEME Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lenses in UK children: Outcomes from a 2-year multi-site interventional trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  3. Clinical evaluation of MyoCare in Europe (CEME) for myopia management: One-year results.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cristina Alvarez-PeregrinaDepartment of Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1097-4581
Miguel Angel Sanchez-TenaDepartment of Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2583-1789
Cesar Villa-CollarFaculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6743-8264
Clara Martinez-PerezISEC LISBOA-Instituto Superior de Educação e Ciências, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-5007
Beatriz de Corcuera-TerreroDepartment of Optometry and Vision, Faculty of Optics and Optometry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nicole LiuSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5705-3467
Wayne LiZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision (Guangzhou) Ltd., Guangzhou, China.
Padmaja SankaridurgSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5537-6193
Arne OhlendorfZEISS Vision Care, Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH, Aalen, BW, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6373-1420
Clinical Evaluation of MyoCare in Europe – the CEME Study Group

Funding

Zeiss Vision Care
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo evaluate the efficacy of CARE spectacle lenses in slowing myopia progression among European children.

methodsIn a 2-year randomised, parallel-group, double-masked, multicentre clinical trial, 234 European children aged 6-13 years were enrolled. All participants were myopic, with a cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) between -0.75 D and -5.00 D, astigmatism ≤1.50 D, anisometropia ≤1.00 D and myopia progression of at least 0.50 D in the previous year. The treatment group received MyoCare spectacle lenses with cylinder annular refractive elements (CARE), the control group single-vision lenses (SVL). Axial length (AL) and SE were measured at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Wearability questionnaires were administered at 1 week and 3 months. Central and peripheral visual acuity (VA) was recorded at dispensing and after 3 months. Generalised linear models estimated changes in SE and AL, adjusting for lens type, age and baseline measurements.

resultsAfter 12 months, children wearing CARE lenses showed less myopia progression, with a difference in SE and AL progression (compared to SVL) of -0.21 D (CI: 0.10 to 0.32 D) and 0.14 mm (CI: -0.17 to -0.10 mm), respectively. Central VA did not decrease with CARE lenses. Peripheral VA decreased by 0.10 and 0.09 logMAR in the nasal and temporal zones, respectively. Analysis of fast progressors indicated that 39.7% of SVL wearing eyes progressed by ≤-0.50 D/year compared to 21.1% with CARE (p < 0.01). For AL, 56.0% of SVL children had an elongation ≥0.20 mm compared to 21.3% with CARE (p < 0.01).

conclusionsIn European children, myopia progression was significantly slower with CARE lenses compared with SVL after 1 year of lens wear. Further monitoring will provide a comprehensive evaluation of long-term efficacy.

Indexed as

EyeglassesMyopiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityAdolescentChildDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodEuropeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomechildrenEuropemyopia controlophthalmic lens

Identifiers

PMID40296784
PMCPMC12087851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.