Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40296777›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025

Long-term multichannel recordings in Drosophila flies reveal altered predictive processing during sleep compared with wake.

Matthew N Van De Poll, Bruno van Swinderen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The exploration of consciousness in insects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew N Van De PollQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-1919
Bruno van SwinderenQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6552-7418

Funding

Australian Research Council DP210102595Australian Research Council DP240102385University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During sleep, behavioral responsiveness to external stimuli is decreased. This classical definition of sleep has been applied effectively across the animal kingdom to identify this common behavioral state in a growing list of creatures, from mammals to invertebrates. Yet, it remains unclear whether decreased behavioral responsiveness during sleep is necessarily associated with decreased responsiveness in brain activity, especially in insects. Here, we performed long-term multichannel electrophysiology in tethered Drosophila melanogaster flies exposed continuously to repetitive visual stimuli. Flies were still able to sleep under these visual stimulation conditions, as determined by traditional immobility duration criteria for the field. Interestingly, we did not find any difference between responses to repetitive visual stimuli during sleep compared with wake when we recorded local field potentials (LFPs) across a transect of the fly brain from optic lobes to the central brain. However, we did find LFP responses to be altered when visual stimuli were variable and of lower probability, especially in the central brain. Central brain responses to less predictable or 'deviant' stimuli were lower during the deepest stage of sleep, a time of quiescence characterized by more regular proboscis extensions. This shows that the sleeping fly brain processes low-probability visual stimuli in a different way from more repeated stimuli, and presents Drosophila as a promising model for studying the potential role of sleep in regulating predictive processing.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterSleepWakefulnessAnimalsBrainFemaleMalePhotic StimulationElectrophysiologySleepVisionVisual responsiveness

Identifiers

PMID40296777
PMCPMC12188248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.