ReviewCurrent pharmaceutical design2025
Advancing Melanoma Care: Microneedles for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Precision.
Review in Current pharmaceutical design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melanoma, an aggressive skin tumor derived from melanocytes, is associated with a high mortality rate attributed to its frequent metastasis, drug resistance, and high invasion rate. The current therapeutic interventions for melanoma, such as surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiation therapy, are not efficient enough to treat melanoma. The current melanoma care is associated with limitations, such as late diagnosis and staging, false positives, treatment resistance, immune-related side effects, lack of standardization, challenges in metastatic melanoma cure, high treatment costs, recurrence, etc. Conventional therapies have poor anti- cancer efficacy due to premature drug degradation, severe adverse effects owing to systemic drug exposure, and low drug concentration at the malignancy site. Moreover, the current diagnosis for melanoma is associated with painful sample collection techniques, limited imaging techniques, limited understanding of genetic markers, etc., leading to misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis. An extensive literature review on Microneedles (MNs) for melanoma diagnosis and treatment was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases from 2012 to 2025. This mini-review presents the advantages of MNs over current therapy, their formulation aspects, and their advancements for the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma. MNs, an emerging drug delivery system, can efficiently penetrate the skin barriers and form reversible microchannels to deliver the drug at melanoma sites without drug leakage, mitigating the adverse effects and increasing drug accumulation. MNs also provide an excellent platform to integrate novel and conventional therapies by encompassing discrete therapeutic agents in a single matrix. Moreover, MNs can capture biomarkers by absorbing the skin Interstitial Fluid (ISF) and facilitate diagnosis by minimal biological samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40296628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.