ReviewJournal of audiology & otology2025
Third Window Syndrome: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review of Causes, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
Review in Journal of audiology & otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Diagnosis of Isolated Saccular Dysfunction Using Trapezius cVEMP: A Detailed Vestibular Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Third window syndrome (TWS) is an inner ear condition caused by an additional compliant point in the otic capsule that disrupts auditory and vestibular functions. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is the most common cause, presenting with hearing loss, vertigo, and autophony, significantly impairing quality of life. This study evaluated the pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatments, and recent advancements in TWS while identifying research gaps. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 70 studies from Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and UpToDate databases were analyzed. TWS affects inner ear mechanics, enhancing bone conduction and reducing air conduction. Diagnosis involves clinical evaluations, high-resolution imaging, and functional tests such as vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, which are known for their high sensitivity and specificity. Management strategies range from vestibular rehabilitation and pharmacotherapy to surgical interventions, including transmastoid and middle cranial fossa approaches, which achieve over 75% success. Emerging minimally invasive techniques, such as underwater endoscopic ear surgery and round window reinforcement, show promise but carry risks like cerebrospinal fluid leakage and inconsistent symptom relief. Advancements in TWS management have improved outcomes, yet gaps remain, particularly in terms of false-positive imaging and long-term efficacy. Future studies should prioritize predictive models and minimally invasive techniques. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.