Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40296434›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Primiparous and multiparous women's birthing experiences and satisfaction with pain management in the first and second stages of vaginal delivery-A prospective cohort study.

Katja Mäkelä, Outi Palomäki, Mika Helminen, Jukka Uotila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katja MäkeläDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-0118
Outi PalomäkiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
Mika HelminenFaculty of Social Sciences, Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Jukka UotilaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

State funding for university-level health research, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing services county of Pirkanmaa
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMost women are satisfied with their delivery experience but the effects of pain relief and different pain relief methods on the birthing experience remain inconsistent. We wanted to evaluate the impact of pain relief on the birthing experience during the first and second stages of labor among primiparous and multiparous women. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 2042 parturients (953 primiparous and 1089 multiparous women) completed a questionnaire on the second day after vaginal delivery and, using visual analogue scale (VAS), assessed their experience and satisfaction with their pain management during the first and second stages of labor. The experiences of primiparous and multiparous women were compared, and the factors associated with positive and negative birthing experiences were ascertained.

resultsOverall birthing experience was better among multiparous than among primiparous women (VAS 8.6 vs. 8.0; p < 0.001). Reported satisfaction with pain management revealed no significant differences between multiparous and primiparous women during the first stage of labor (VAS 8.2 vs. 8.1) or the second stage of labor (VAS 7.8 vs. 7.7). Some variation was reported in satisfaction with the various pain management methods, epidural and spinal block having the highest ratings during both stages of labor. However, despite differences in satisfaction with pain management, in overall birthing experience, no difference according to pain relief administered was reported among multiparous and only minor differences in primiparous women in the second stage of labor. Those parturients reporting negative birthing experiences (VAS ≤5) reported relatively high satisfaction with pain management during the first stage of labor (medians 8 and 8 in multiparous and primiparous women respectively) while satisfaction with second-stage pain management was clearly lower (respective medians 2 and 5). In a regression model satisfaction with pain management during the second stage of labor varied significantly with birthing experience.

conclusionsThe childbirth experience was slightly better among multiparous than among primiparous women, although there were no significant differences regarding satisfaction with pain management according to parity during the first or second stage of labor. Satisfaction with pain relief during the second stage of labor was significantly associated with overall birthing experience.

Indexed as

Analgesia, ObstetricalDelivery, ObstetricLabor PainLabor Stage, FirstLabor Stage, SecondPain ManagementParityPatient SatisfactionAdultFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPregnancyProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultbirthing experiencepain management during laborpain relief during laborparity and laborsatisfaction with childbirth

Identifiers

PMID40296434
PMCPMC12087509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.