ReviewEuropean journal of neurology2025
Neurovascular Involvement in Fibromuscular Dysplasia: A Clue for Reappraisal of Old Classifications.
Review in European journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- When thrombus points to the culprit and meets middle cerebral artery anomalies.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Intracranial Aneurysms: A Narrative Review of a Dangerous and Underestimated Association.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Fibromuscular dysplasia: Challenges for the current classification.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Article
- Carotid Web: An Update Focusing on Its Relationship With Fibromuscular Dysplasia and Therapeutic Strategy.Journal of stroke · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a non-atheromatous, non-inflammatory arteriopathy involving the medium and small-sized arteries virtually in all vascular beds. The most frequently involved arteries are cerebroafferent and renal arteries. The current classification of the diseases is mostly imaging based and two subtypes are defined: a multifocal one and a focal one. The multifocal pattern corresponds to the typical "string of beads", which is the most frequently reported subtype.
aimsIn this review, we are presenting the several phenotypes of FMD neuroimaging, including the associated conditions, mainly dissection and aneurysms. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe reviewed the literature on neurovascular subtypes of FMD starting from the historical angiographic studies, validated versu pathologuy.
resultsPrevious description of the diseases relied on angiographic appearance and had a close relationship with the pathological classification. In particular, the angiographic classification of the neurovascular involvement contained much more details than the current classification, including multifocal, focal and atypical subtypes. DISCUSSION: Atypical subtype was missed in the transition from pathology to non-invasive vascular imaging, but some features of the old classifications deserve to be retrieved in order to do not miss some phenotypes of FMD.
conclusionsThe different imaging phenotypes might correspond to different clinical and prognostic phenotypes and their description supports the need of an updated classification, taking into accounts the past imaging subtypes and helping to address the underdiagnoses of FMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.