Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40296220›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2025

Adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer at high risk of peritoneal metastases: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Julie J M Hamm, Rudolf van den Berg, Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou, E Sophie Zwanenburg, Gijsbert D Musters, Pieter J Tanis, Alvaro Arjona-Sanchez, COLOPEC and HIPECT4 Collaborator Groups

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julie J M HammDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-8655-3275
Rudolf van den BergDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-8850-6166
Eleni-Rosalina AndrinopoulouDepartment of Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
E Sophie ZwanenburgDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9132-0821
Gijsbert D MustersDepartment of Surgery, Zaans Medical Centre, Zaandam, The Netherlands.
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-3310
Alvaro Arjona-SanchezUnit of Oncological and Pancreatic Surgery, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3024-3009
COLOPEC and HIPECT4 Collaborator Groups

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society (KWF)Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica Córdoba Consejería Salud Junta de Andalucía 2018Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW)Public Health SystemSpanish Association of Surgeons 2010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout a quarter of patients with locally advanced colon cancer (pT4) develop locoregional recurrence, including peritoneal metastases. The aim of this individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with regard to reducing the locoregional recurrence rate in the overall population and high-risk subgroups of patients with locally advanced colon cancer.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in July 2024 to identify RCTs on adjuvant HIPEC in addition to routine adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced colon carcinoma. An IPDMA was performed, with the locoregional recurrence rate as the primary endpoint and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoints.

resultsThe search identified two trials (COLOPEC and HIPECT4). Individual patient data were pooled for 386 patients, of whom 189 patients received adjuvant HIPEC and 197 patients constituted the control group. The median follow-up was 36 (interquartile range 32-60) months. A modified intention-to-treat analysis showed a 36-month locoregional recurrence rate of 16.0% for HIPEC patients and 21.2% for control patients (P = 0.295). Predefined subgroup analyses revealed a significant reduction in locoregional recurrence after HIPEC in patients with right-sided tumours (HR 0.56 (95% c.i. 0.48 to 0.67)) (P < 0.001). No significant differences in survival were found for the overall study population; low event rates in subgroups did not allow for survival analyses.

conclusionAdjuvant HIPEC significantly reduced the locoregional recurrence rate in right-sided locally advanced colon cancer, but not in the overall study population. Definitive conclusions on DFS and OS require longer follow-up.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPeritoneal NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID40296220
PMCPMC12037274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.