ArticleChild: care, health and development2025
Towards Context-Specific EHDI Services: Understanding Caregivers' Priorities and Preferences in South Africa Through a Conjoint Analysis.
Article in Child: care, health and development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programmes are critical for addressing hearing impairment in children by ensuring timely diagnosis and intervention. However, systemic barriers such as linguistic diversity, financial constraints and geographic accessibility challenges hinder equitable access to EHDI services in South Africa. This study explores caregivers' preferences for key attributes of EHDI services to inform the development of context-specific and family-centred programmes.
methodsA cross-sectional survey utilizing conjoint analysis was conducted with 31 caregivers of children with hearing impairment enrolled in early intervention preschools in Gauteng, South Africa. Participants evaluated five key attributes of EHDI services: language of service provision, location of diagnostic evaluations, mode of early intervention delivery, integration of support services and cost reduction strategies. Data were analysed using the conditional logit model to determine attribute preferences.
resultsCaregivers preferred services provided in their home language, diagnostic evaluations conducted at the nearest healthcare facility, home-based early intervention sessions, regular integration of support services and reductions in the cost of EHDI services. Reluctance to adopt telehealth was also noted, highlighting concerns about technological literacy, internet access and trust in virtual care delivery. These preferences emphasize the need for accessible, linguistically congruent and affordable EHDI services tailored to the South African context.
conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into caregivers' preferences for EHDI services, offering actionable recommendations to address systemic barriers such as designing EHDI services that address systemic barriers to ensure equity in healthcare access. Policymakers and stakeholders should prioritize linguistically diverse service delivery, improve healthcare facility accessibility, incorporate continuous informational counselling and reduce financial burdens to ensure equitable and family-centred EHDI programmes. Future research should explore preferences among a more geographically and socio-economically diverse population to further refine these recommendations. While grounded in South Africa, the results provide insights applicable to other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with similar challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.