Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40296109›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Conditions for and potential solutions associated with continuity of care for patients with complex care needs across Swedish regions with differing population densities.

Linda Ljungholm, Charlotte Klinga, Mirjam Ekstedt, Anette Edin-Liljegren, Elin-Sofie Forsgärde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda LjungholmDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Växjö, SE-391 82, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0338-7610
Charlotte KlingaAcademic Primary Healthcare Centre, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0512-8719
Mirjam EkstedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Växjö, SE-391 82, Sweden. mirjam.ekstedt@lnu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4108-391X
Anette Edin-LiljegrenDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3220-9557
Elin-Sofie ForsgärdeDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Växjö, SE-391 82, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8358-3920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study, conducted across three distinct geographical regions in Sweden, highlights the diverse conditions and challenges in healthcare provision. The study focuses on the sparsely populated northern regions of Sweden, the capital city of Stockholm, and the southeast rural area of Sweden. Each location presents unique obstacles to continuity of care, influenced by factors such as population density and geographical disparities. By examining the experiences of patients with complex care needs, their family carers, and healthcare personnel, this study aims to describe the conditions for and identify potential solutions associated with the delivery of continuity in care in different geographical regions of Sweden, with differing population densities.

methodSecondary analysis was conducted using qualitative content analysis on interview data from two studies, consisting of 53 transcripts from individual, pair, and focus group interviews held between August 2018 and November 2019. The potential solutions identified from participants' experiences were categorized into region-specific and common themes. Three personas-Vera, Bo, and Inga-were developed, each representing a scenario based on the region-specific analyses.

resultsDespite regional differences, universal solutions to common challenges were identified focusing on relational, management, and informational aspects. Common key obstacles to continuity of care included resource shortages, insufficient information transfer, and privacy regulations. Possible solutions for overcoming these challenges include prioritizing relational continuity, streamlining processes, and advocating for a unified communication system. By collaborating, building trust, understanding patient preferences, and ensuring clear communication, healthcare personnel can effectively promote continuity of care.

conclusionsBuilding a stable workforce while prioritizing relational continuity, along with patients' preferences and needs, is essential for ensuring continuity of care from multiple providers. Digital solutions can enhance collaboration across distances, while coordinating responsibilities within smaller geographical areas can strengthen partnerships among healthcare organizations. Direct dialogue, along with ensuring that everyone has access to relevant information through a unified communication system, is vital for management continuity. By integrating these universal and transferable solutions to the obstacles associated with continuity of care, we can create a cohesive care experience for patients, regardless of geographical and demographic conditions.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CarePopulation DensityAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenCollaborationCommunicationContinuity of patient careCoordinationIntegrated carePatient care managementPerson-centered care

Identifiers

PMID40296109
PMCPMC12036265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.