ArticleBMC public health2025
Exploring barriers and enablers to implementation of cancer screening among primary care professionals seeing marginalized patients.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Personal and family application of cancer prevention practices among physicians.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Can general practitioners use smoking status data in electronic health records to recruit patients for lung cancer screening? A descriptive study using the MedicineInsight database.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Exploring current cancer screening practices and guidelines for adults under age 50 in the United States.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer screening is an important prevention tool shown to improve cancer morbidity and mortality. Primary care professionals (PCPs) can play an important role in facilitating cancer screening and addressing barriers. Our aim was to learn from PCPs that see a high proportion of patients experiencing marginalization and that have high screening rates in their practices (high performers) to identify key barriers and enablers to addressing cancer screening with this patient population.
methodsThis was a qualitative descriptive study conducted using the principles of 'design thinking' to engage PCPs who are high performers in order to understand key barriers and enablers to cancer screening. An interview guide informed by the Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care was used to collect data. Participants eligible for this study included both physicians and nurse practitioners working in Ontario in a variety of settings including solo and team-based practice models. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and checked for quality assurance. Transcripts were coded by two independent members of the research team using deductive content analysis. The data were mapped onto the Systems Model of Clinical Preventive Care domains and presented in a narrative summary.
resultsWe interviewed a total of 22 PCPs of which 54.5% were women and just over half (54.5%) were White. Most participants worked in a team-based primary care model. Our results suggest that a number of strategies can support high screening rates among those experiencing marginalization including interprofessional team-based collaborative practice, culturally competent and trauma-informed care, and adaptive approaches to overcome barriers such as improving the ease, access, and acceptability of the screening test.
conclusionAddressing cancer screening with patients experiencing marginalization requires a multi-pronged approach to care to facilitate screening. Team-based models of care may have more infrastructure and supports in place to support PCPs in addressing cancer screening with patients experiencing marginalization. Lastly, providers and teams need to work in a supportive clinical context that allows for innovation to address system barriers to promote and enable screening for those who are structurally marginalized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.