SynthesisBMC palliative care2025
The benefits of early palliative care on psychological well-being, functional status, and health-related quality of life among cancer patients and their caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early analgesic response to interventional pain procedures in hospitalized patients with cancer-related pain: clinical predictors and exploratory survival analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Content Validation of Primary Care Network Assessment Scale for Palliative Care Patients (ARCP) and Clinical Utility in Patients With Advanced Cancer.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Longitudinal Changes in Somatosensory Function and Their Association with Pain Trajectory Groups in a Portuguese Cancer Center Cohort.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Individualized Physiotherapy Improves Quality of Life and Symptom Burden in Advanced Cancer: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Caregiver guilt as an underrecognised burden in family cancer caregiving: a scoping review and implications for palliative care support.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- The Impact of Specialist Palliative Care on the Utilization of Health Care Services at the End of Life Among Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Register-based Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Women's experiences toward cervical cancer care at the initiation of care: a qualitative study closing the gap policy and implementation in Indonesia.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Integrated palliative nursing interventions for older adults with cancer: Effects on quality of life, psychological outcomes, and symptom burden.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Assessing the Impact of Specialist Palliative Care on Healthcare Utilisation at the End of Life Among Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Nationwide Register-Based Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- The association between lumbopelvic fixation and improved pain and function in patients with unstable pathologic sacral fractures.Journal of neurosurgery. Spine · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Related Characteristics of Informal Caregivers Providing Home Health Care to Elderly Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Symptom burden and patient characteristics in specialist palliative care: a descriptive analysis.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Caregiver satisfaction with early integrated palliative care in oncology: secondary outcomes from the PALLiON cluster-RCT.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Perceived stress, distress, burden, and caregiving preparedness in family caregivers of patients with hematologic malignancies during the first months of treatment.Journal of psychosocial oncology · 2026Article
- Training and Practice Gaps in Nursing Home Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Self-perceived burden, fear of progression and psychological flexibility in cervical cancer survivors: A moderated network analysis.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Temporal trends and determinants of inpatient palliative care utilization among hospitalized patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life and Patient Experience in Oncology Palliative Care Within the Saudi Model of Care Framework: Evidence from the Qassim Health Cluster, Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementing the Swedish palliative care guide in geriatrics - a qualitative study using small-group and individual interviews.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with cancer and their caregivers experience significant psychological, physical, and emotional burdens throughout the disease trajectory which reduces their quality of life (QoL). Early palliative care (EPC) has been proposed as a strategy to alleviate physical, psychological and emotional burdens and improve health outcomes. While evidence generally supports the benefits of EPC, variations in reported outcomes highlight the need for a deeper understanding of its impact across different patient populations and healthcare settings.
objectiveThe primary aim of this study was to evaluate the pooled effects of EPC on psychological, functional status, and QoL outcomes in both cancer patients and their caregivers. The secondary aim was to evaluate the satisfaction of the patients and their family caregivers.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the preferred reporting item for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Four databases, PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Cochrane, were searched up to January 2024. This study included randomized controlled trial (RCT) and pilot-RCT studies reporting psychological outcomes (anxiety, depression), functional status, QoL, and satisfaction in cancer patients and their caregivers. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the short-term (< 24 weeks) versus long-term (≥ 24 weeks) effects of EPC. Mean differences (MD) and standard mean differences (SMD) were calculated using a fixed-effects model according to the Mantel-Haenszel model and a random-effects model according to the DerSimonian and Laird method.
resultsA total of 24 studies met our inclusion criteria. For cancer patients, EPC significantly reduced anxiety (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.02; -0.23, p = 0.002) and improved QoL (SMD 0.13, 95%CI: 0.06; 0.19, p = 0.0004). However, there was no significant reduction in depression (SMD -0.15, 95% CI: -0.36; 0.05, p = 0.14) and improvement in functional status (MD = 2.14, 95% CI: -0.78; 5.06, p = 0.15). Subgroup analysis revealed that long-term EPC significantly reduced anxiety and depression while improving QoL, but had no significant effects on functional status. For caregivers, EPC did not significantly impact either physical or mental QoL (Short form/SF-36 physical: MD = 0.81, 95% CI: -0.46; 2.09, p = 0.21; SF-36 Mental: MD = 0.53, 95% CI: -1.03; 2.08, p = 0.51). Moreover, satisfaction was more likely to be higher in patients and their caregivers who received EPC than in those who received usual care (MD 2.45, 95% CI: 0.90; 4.01, p = 0.002, MD 4.09, 95% CI: 0.60; 7.58, p = 0.02, respectively).
conclusionEPC reduces long term psychological burden and improve QoL and care satisfaction experience among patients with cancer. Therefore, EPC should be more broadly introduced into cancer care earlier to address patient's psychological burdens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.