ArticleBMC oral health2025
Prevalence and morphology study of distolingual root in mandibular first and second molars in Thai population: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between C-shaped root canal configuration in mandibular second molars and radix entomolaris in mandibular first molars: a CBCT-based study in a Western Chinese population.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Root and canal morphology of mandibular second molars in a Chinese Kazakh population by cone-beam computed tomography.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the prevalence and morphological characteristics of distolingual roots in permanent mandibular molars among a Thai population using a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
methodsThis retrospective study consisted of two parts: prevalence and morphology study. A total of 5228 permanent mandibular first and second molars from 2623 Thai patients were included in the prevalence study, and CBCT images were analyzed to identify the presence of distolingual roots. Additionally, 288 teeth with distolingual roots were subjected to further analysis to assess their root morphology, canal configuration, and orifice location. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's chi-square test, paired t-test, and other appropriate methods.
resultsThe prevalence of distolingual roots in permanent mandibular molars was 9.14% among the examined teeth and 14.94% among the examined patients. The majority of distolingual roots were classified as type C according to Carlsen and Alexandersen's classification, and type III according to Song's classification. Additionally, the vast majority of teeth exhibited Vertucci type I canal configuration. Further analysis revealed that the mean interorifice distances between DB-DL, ML-DL, and MB-ML orifices were 3.01 ± 0.6 mm, 3.43 ± 0.57 mm, and 2.61 ± 0.59 mm, respectively. The angle and radius of curvature of distolingual roots in the proximal view were greater than those in the clinical view (p < 0.001).
conclusionsThis study provides comprehensive insights into the prevalence and morphological characteristics of distolingual roots in permanent mandibular molars among a Thai population. These findings emphasize the importance of thorough preoperative assessment and awareness of root morphology variations to enhance the success of endodontic treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.