Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295967›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2025

Building and sustaining therapeutic relationships across treatment settings: a qualitative study of how patients navigate the group dynamics of mental healthcare.

Henrik Wang Iversen, Henriette Riley, Marit Råbu, Geir Fagerjord Lorem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patient removals: a symptom of a changing era for the doctor-patient relationship.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henrik Wang IversenDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway. hwa006@uit.no.
Henriette RileyDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.
Marit RåbuDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Geir Fagerjord LoremDepartment of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic relationships are vital for patients with complex and long-term psychosocial needs, yet such patients often face fragmented and unstable relationships within mental healthcare. These patients are more often than others moved between treatment settings and caregiving teams. Statutory obligations strain the relationships with frequent hospitalizations adding to the burden This study explores how these patients perceive and navigate therapeutic relationships, highlighting both positive and negative experiences across various treatment settings.

methodsThis is a qualitative study with a narrative approach utilizing in-depth interviews focusing on participants personal experiences and perceptions. We utilized purposive sampling to recruit patients with extensive hospitalization experience, operationalized as more than four admissions within one year or more than four successive weeks of hospitalization. Our sample consisted of 16 participants, twelve women and four men. The interviews were analyzed using a holistic-content approach.

resultsWe found that therapeutic relationships were built on healthcare professionals recognizing and addressing patients' needs and advocating for their interests within the service system. Participants described therapeutic relationships as sources of collaboration, stability, and support but found them challenging to sustain due to fear of rejection and institutional barriers. Successful relationships worked as a vital buffer, offering protection against malpractices and depersonalized care.

conclusionTherapeutic relationships play a crucial role in supporting patients with complex needs, but relational dilemmas and malignant group dynamics often impede their development. Mental healthcare services have an ethical responsibility to foster and maintain therapeutic environments and professional cultures that enable personalized care, while maintaining boundaries through reflective practices.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesMental DisordersMental Health ServicesProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultFemaleGroup DynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchComplex psychosocial needsMental healthcarePaternalismPatient-Centered carePatient empowermentPatient-Provider interactionQualitative methodsStigmaTherapeutic relationships

Identifiers

PMID40295967
PMCPMC12036144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.