ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Self-harming behaviors among forensic psychiatric patients who committed violent offences: an exploratory study on the role of circumstances during the index offence and victim characteristics.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy and its associations with violent behaviors among forensic psychiatry patients.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Characteristics of women admitted to medium secure care: a comparison of patients admitted to specialised single-sex and mixed-sex services in an English forensic psychiatric hospital.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSelf-harming behaviors are common among forensic patients with violent index offenses. While various factors, including feelings of shame and guilt, may influence self-harming behaviors, little is known about how the circumstances surrounding the index offense and the victims' characteristics affect self-harming tendencies among forensic patients. In this study, we examined the association of the circumstances surrounding the index offence and victim characteristics with self-harming behaviors among forensic patients who have committed violent offences.
methodsThe present study consisted of 845 forensic psychiatric patients under the Ontario Review Board who had violent offences (Mean age = 42.13 ± 13.29; 85.68% male) in the reporting year 2014/15. The study examined the association between self-harming incidents with the circumstances during the index offense and victims' characteristics while controlling for clinical and demographic factors based on multiple hierarchical negative binominal regression.
resultsThe prevalence of self-harm was 4.14%, and more than half (61.29%) of the patients with self-harming behaviors had multiple incidents. The total number of self-harming incidences recorded in the reporting year was 113. The results showed that of the overall 24.05% explained by the models, the victim's characteristics contributed approximately 5% points, and circumstances during the index offence contributed an additional 2% points in explaining self-harming behaviors among forensic psychiatric patients during the reporting year. In the final model, the risk of self-harm increased with having a victim who was a healthcare/support staff or a co-patient/cohabitant.
conclusionSelf-harm among forensic patients who committed violent offences is associated with various factors, including previous history of self-harm and the victim's characteristics, especially when the victim was a healthcare/support worker or co-patient. These findings suggest that self-harm might be a maladaptive way of coping with negative emotions, such as feelings of guilt and shame triggered by harming others. Mitigating measures for self-harm among patients with violent offences need to be robust and individualized, taking into consideration vulnerability issues and the best available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.