ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Empowerment among treatment-engaged individuals living with schizophrenia in Tanzania.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAs low-resource settings move to address the treatment and social service gap for people living with schizophrenia (PLWS), person-centered and recovery-oriented interventions should monitor impacts on empowerment. This study explores empowerment and associated factors among PLWS in Tanzania.
methodsThis study uses endline data from the Culturally Adapted Family Psychoeducation for Adults with Psychotic Disorders in Tanzania (KUPAA) pilot trial. Participants included 66 dyads of PLWS and caregivers recruited from two tertiary-level hospitals. The main outcome variable of interest was empowerment (Rogers 28-item Empowerment Scale), and the main exposure variable was Participation in Society (Domain 6 of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS 2.0). Key psychosocial correlates of interest included hopefulness, general self-efficacy, internalized stigma, and family functioning. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to explore variable relationships.
resultsThere were 21 women and 40 men with a mean age of 32 years. Bivariate analyses revealed greater participation in society (p < 0.0003) was correlated with greater empowerment, higher hopefulness (p < 0.0001) and higher self-efficacy (p < 0.0001). Lower empowerment was correlated with higher self-stigma (p < 0.0001) and worse family functioning (p < .001). Multivariable models indicated more participation in society was associated with higher empowerment, but when hope, self-efficacy, internalized stigma, and/or family functioning were added to the models, those factors were more strongly correlated with empowerment than participation in society.
conclusionEmpowerment is increasingly being recognized as an important outcome of psychosocial interventions. Understanding empowerment and its possible effects on recovery-centered outcomes is important when thinking of future interventions for PLWS in low-resource settings. Future recovery-oriented interventions and research should both consider including empowerment measurement among PLWS and incorporate their lived experiences in psychosocial treatment programming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.