Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295931›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2025

In-vitro antimicrobial activity of new antimicrobial agents against Streptococcus pneumoniae and potential resistance mechanisms: a multicenter study.

Zichen Lei, Qi Liu, Yiqun Ma, Xinrui Yang, Hao Zu, Ziyao Li, Feilong Zhang, Dongya Pu, Yulin Zhang, Binghuai Lu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Resistance of gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens to omadacycline: a systematic review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zichen Lei *China-Japan Friendship Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qi Liu *China-Japan Friendship Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiqun MaLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Surveillance, Early Warning and Pathogen Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinrui YangLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Surveillance, Early Warning and Pathogen Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hao ZuCapital Medical University-YanJing Medical School, Beijing, China.
Ziyao LiLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Surveillance, Early Warning and Pathogen Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Feilong ZhangLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Surveillance, Early Warning and Pathogen Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dongya PuChina-Japan Friendship Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yulin ZhangLaboratory of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Center of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Key Laboratory of Surveillance, Early Warning and Pathogen Research on Emerging Infectious Diseases, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. zhangyulin07@163.com.
Binghuai LuChina-Japan Friendship Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. zs25041@126.com.

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation-Daxing Innovation Joint Fund Project L246043Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality L222073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStreptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of invasive and non-invasive diseases, particularly in children and immunocompromised individuals, with an annual mortality of approximately 800,000 children worldwide. The rise of antibiotic-resistant strains complicates treatment, especially with increasing resistance to penicillin, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. The study on the resistance of newly developed antimicrobial agents against S. pneumoniae was rarely reported. Furthermore, understanding the relationship between serotypes, resistance mechanisms, and virulence in S. pneumoniae is essential for disease management and vaccine development.

methodsA total of 208 S. pneumoniae isolates were collected across nine hospitals in seven Chinese cities/provinces from January 2023 to June 2024. Molecular characteristics were analyzed using whole-genome sequencing to identify serotypes, sequence types, virulence genes, and potential resistance mechanisms. Antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) was performed against 14 agents, involving new antibiotics (eravacycline, omadacycline, nemonoxacin, and contezolid).

resultsSerotypes 19 F (24.6%) and 23 F (11.1%) predominated, with vaccine coverage rates of PCV13 at 66.8%. High resistance rates in S. pneumoniae were observed for erythromycin (208/208, 100%), clindamycin (197/208, 94.7%), and tetracycline (192/208, 92.3%). 13.5% (28/208) and 2.9% (6/208) strains were intermediate and resistant to penicillin, respectively. The new antibiotics showed low resistance, namely, 1.9% (4/208), 0.5% (1/208), 1.9% (4/208), and 7.2% (15/208) resistant to eravacycline, omadacycline, contezolid, and nemonoxacin, respectively. Resistance mechanisms included mutations in 23S rRNA for oxazolidinones, tet genes for tetracyclines, and gyrA/parC for fluoroquinolones.

conclusionsS. pneumoniae in China exhibits high genetic diversity and significant antibiotic resistance, underscoring the need for continuous surveillance and updated vaccines. New antibiotics remain effective against multidrug-resistant strains, offering potential treatment options in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialPneumococcal InfectionsStreptococcus pneumoniaeChildChild, PreschoolChinaDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPneumococcal VaccinesSerogroupWhole Genome SequencingAnti-Bacterial AgentsPneumococcal VaccinesContezolidEravacyclineNemonoxacinNew antibioticsOmadacyclineResistanceStreptococcus pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID40295931
PMCPMC12036140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.