ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2025
Structural control over single-crystalline oxides for heterogeneous catalysis.
Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrastable Non-Noble-Metal Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalyst for Industrial-Level Water Electrolysis.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Improving crystal material property prediction with multi-view geometric graph transformer.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Sustainable and Scalable Flow Photochemical Conversions Using a Labile Ligand-Assembled Iron Complex.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Optimization of NiMo alloy nanoparticles for catalytic dry reforming of methane.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Dynamics in electrochemical organic oxidation reactions from in situ and operando techniques.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxides are integral to heterogeneous catalysis, serving critical roles such as catalyst supports, active materials and electrodes. A highly ordered subset, single-crystalline oxides, have traditionally been used as model catalyst supports in fundamental surface science studies. However, advancements in bulk synthesis have rendered their general use more feasible for real-world applications. In this review, we explore the efficiency of single-crystalline oxides as active metals and supports across a wide range of heterogeneous processes, often performing exceptionally well. Beginning with synthetic methods, we discuss the advantages of single-crystalline oxides in thermo-, electro- and photocatalysis. Previously held conventions about catalytic activity, deactivation and surface-adsorbate interactions are re-evaluated by understanding how these ordered materials behave during the respective reactions. Last, we assess advances in characterization techniques and their impact on designing the next generation of catalysts based on single-crystalline oxides.
Identifiers
40295894What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.