Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295879›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2025

Interictal network dysfunction and cognitive impairment in epilepsy.

Jennifer N Gelinas, Dion Khodagholy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Implantable bioelectronic outlet.Science advances · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Resting-state EEG markers of cognitive dysfunction in epilepsy: evidence from gamma power, alpha activity, and functional connectivity.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer N GelinasDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. gelinasj@hs.uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1164-638X
Dion KhodagholyDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. dion.kh@uci.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epilepsy is diagnosed when neural networks become capable of generating excessive or hypersynchronous activity patterns that result in observable seizures. In many cases, epilepsy is associated with cognitive comorbidities that persist between seizures and negatively impact quality of life. Dysregulation of the coordinated physiological network interactions that are required for cognitive function has been implicated in mediating these enduring symptoms, but the causal mechanisms are often elusive. Here, we provide an overview of neural network abnormalities with the potential to contribute to cognitive dysfunction in epilepsy. We examine these pathological interactions across spatial and temporal scales, additionally highlighting the dynamics that arise in response to the brain's intrinsic capacity for plasticity. Understanding these processes will facilitate development of network-level interventions to address cognitive comorbidities that remain undertreated by currently available epilepsy therapeutics.

Indexed as

BrainCognitive DysfunctionEpilepsyNerve NetAnimalsHumansNeuronal Plasticity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.