ArticleScientific reports2025
Stability and robustness of kinetochore dynamics under sudden perturbations and stochastic influences.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delayed Signaling in Mitotic Checkpoints: Biological Mechanisms and Modeling Perspectives.Biology · 2026Review
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the dynamic behavior of kinetochores is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of accurate chromosome segregation during cell division. In this study, we introduced non-linear exponents p and q into two new systems to capture the complex movements that govern the intersister movement of kinetochores during chromosome segregation. Our analysis revealed a power-law relationship between these exponents and the maximum amplitude A of sister kinetochore 2, indicating that even small adjustments in p and q lead to significant changes in kinetochore movement. This sensitivity suggests that kinetochore dynamics are governed by scale-invariant principles, potentially reflecting intrinsic properties of the kinetochore-microtubule interface such as motor protein activity. We observed that the Type II model with perturbation functions, demonstrated stability with rapidly dampening oscillations across various forms of noise and sudden shocks. This highlights the effectiveness of adaptable regulatory mechanisms in maintaining stability during mitosis. In contrast, the Type I model without such regulatory parameters exhibited sustained, bounded oscillations that did not dampen over time and showed significant fragility under stochastic noise, potentially compromising chromosome segregation fidelity. Our findings highlight the role of the exponents p and q in modulating kinetochore behavior and suggest that enhancing or mimicking these regulatory mechanisms could be a potential strategy for improving cell division fidelity as shown in our theoretical work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.