Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295759›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ampullary tumors exhibit increased Fusobacterium in both the tumor surface and surrounding duodenal mucosa during carcinoma progression.

Yoshihisa Takada, Kenta Yamamoto, Takuya Ishikawa, Kentaro Yamao, Yasuyuki Mizutani, Tadashi Iida, Kota Uetsuki, Takashi Hirose, Keiko Maeda, Takeshi Yamamura and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yoshihisa TakadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Kenta YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Takuya IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan. ishitaku@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Kentaro YamaoDepartment of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuyuki MizutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Tadashi IidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Kota UetsukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Takashi HiroseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Keiko MaedaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Takeshi YamamuraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Kazuhiro FurukawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Eizaburo OhnoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Masanao NakamuraDepartment of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi HondaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.
Hiroki KawashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65, Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan.

Funding

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 21K19897Moonshot Research and Development Program JPMJMS2214-11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the complex interplay between intestinal microbiomes and ampullary tumors is crucial for distinguishing between adenomas and carcinomas, especially when considering the role of Fusobacterium. We characterized the microbiome associated with ampullary tumors using samples collected from the tumor surface (tumor samples, TSs) and surrounding normal duodenal mucosa (normal samples, NSs) via brush rubbing. In total, samples from 17 patients, divided into an adenoma group (n = 11) and a carcinoma group (n = 6), were analyzed. The Shannon α-diversity index was significantly higher in the carcinoma group compared with the adenoma group, indicating a more diverse bacterial community in the carcinoma environment. The TSs of the carcinoma group exhibited enrichment of Fusobacterium, Leptotrichia, Methylorubrum, and Micrococcus. The relative abundance of Fusobacterium increased as the tumor progressed. The NSs of the carcinoma group showed a higher presence of Fusobacterium, Porphyromonas, Granulicatella, Rikenellaceae RC9 gut group, and Solobacterium, whereas Bergeyella was more prevalent in the adenoma group. These results suggest that ampullary carcinomas exhibit a characteristic microbiome compared to adenomas. Fusobacterium is enriched in the tumor and surrounding normal duodenal mucosa, increases in abundance as the tumor progresses, and may be associated with ampullary tumors.

Indexed as

AdenomaAmpulla of VaterCarcinomaCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsDuodenumFusobacteriumIntestinal MucosaAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40295759
PMCPMC12037904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.