Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295751›Full record

ArticleNature materials2025

Ab initio structure solutions from nanocrystalline powder diffraction data via diffusion models.

Gabe Guo, Tristan Luca Saidi, Maxwell W Terban, Michele Valsecchi, Simon J L Billinge, Hod Lipson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Generative Models for Crystalline Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Dara: Automated Multiple-Hypothesis Phase Identification and Refinement from Powder X‑ray Diffraction.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial intelligence in action: building simulation and analysis tools for powder diffraction.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gabe GuoColumbia University, Department of Computer Science, New York, NY, USA. gabeguo@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-9162
Tristan Luca SaidiColumbia University, Department of Computer Science, New York, NY, USA.
Maxwell W TerbanMomentum Transfer, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7094-1266
Michele ValsecchiColumbia University, Department of Chemical Engineering, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1835-3552
Simon J L BillingeColumbia University, Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, New York, NY, USA. sb2896@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9734-4998
Hod LipsonColumbia University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, New York, NY, USA. hod.lipson@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-4618

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 2112085U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0024141U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0025528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in materials science is the determination of the structure of nanometre-sized objects. Here we present an approach that uses a generative machine learning model based on diffusion processes that are trained on 45,229 known structures. The model factors measured the diffraction pattern as well as the relevant statistical priors on the unit cell of atomic cluster structures. Conditioned only on the chemical formula and the information-scarce finite-sized broadened powder diffraction pattern, we find that our model, PXRDnet, can successfully solve the simulated nanocrystals as small as 10 Å across 200 materials of varying symmetries and complexities, including structures from all seven crystal systems. We show that our model can successfully and verifiably determine structural candidates four out of five times, with an average error among these candidates being only 7% (as measured by the post-Rietveld refinement R-factor). Furthermore, PXRDnet is capable of solving structures from noisy diffraction patterns gathered in real-world experiments. We suggest that data-driven approaches, bootstrapped from theoretical simulation, will ultimately provide a path towards determining the structure of previously unsolved nanomaterials.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.