ArticleScientific reports2025
Study on energy retrofits for rural residential envelopes in Northwest China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Grounded theory-KANO model for optimising peri-urban rural housing design.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rural dwellings in Northwest China are typically self-built, lack energy-saving measures, and suffer from high energy consumption and poor thermal performance. Retrofitting building envelopes is a key strategy to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. However, most existing studies focus on single-factor retrofits and single-objective evaluations, limiting their comprehensiveness and practical application. This study addresses these gaps by investigating single- and multi-factor retrofit scenarios for a typical rural house in Dingxi City of Northwest China. Using orthogonal experiments and DeST-h simulations, optimal combinations of envelope elements were identified, and the entropy method was applied to evaluate energy savings, incremental costs, cost-effectiveness, payback periods, and carbon-emission reductions. The results of the case show that exterior wall insulation is the most effective single-factor retrofit, achieving energy-saving rates of 45.79-48.46%, while roof insulation and additional sunspaces yield over 20% energy savings. Multi-factor retrofits significantly outperform single-factor schemes, with energy-saving rates ranging from 46.84 to 70.47%. The optimal retrofit solution includes 70 mm EPS boards for exterior walls, 80 mm XPS boards for roof thermal insulation, a window-to-wall ratio of 20%, broken-bridge aluminum hollow windows (6 + 12A + 6), and insulated glass for the sunspace. This study contributes to integrating energy, economic, and environmental dimensions, addressing the limitations of previous single-objective methods by developing a comprehensive evaluation framework. It also provides region-specific retrofit solutions tailored for the climatic and socioeconomic conditions of Dingxi City in Northwest China. These findings offer practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners to enhance energy efficiency and promote sustainable rural housing development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.