ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel scoring system for heart failure screening utilizing combined electrocardiogram, phonocardiogram, and radial artery features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synchronous Acquisition and Processing of Electro- and Phono-Cardiogram Signals for Accurate Systolic Times' Measurement in Heart Disease Diagnosis and Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure has high prevalence and mortality all over the world, the screening of heart failure still needs improving. This study aimed to construct a risk score of early clinical detection for heart failure based on features associated with electrocardiogram (ECG), phonocardiogram (PCG), and radial artery. This study collected data of 813 participants from the First People's Hospital of Shangqiu city, between January 2023 and December 2023. All the samples were randomly divided into the training set and the testing set at a ratio of 7:3. Features selected through logistic regression and stepwise regression were included in the construction of the scoring system. The screening values of this scoring system for heart failure were verified in the testing set, with the odds ratio (OR), area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) as well as their respective 95% confidence interval (CI) for evaluation. Totally 813 participants were included in this study. Participants with heart failure had higher scores than those without. The elevation of the score was associated with increased risk of heart failure in the training set (OR = 4.461, 95%CI: 3.209-6.200) and testing set (OR = 3.854, 95%CI: 2.364-6.281). The AUC of the risk score for heart failure was 0.802 (95%CI: 0.744-0.859) in the training set and 0.762 (95%CI: 0.669-0.855) in the testing set. The risk score had good screening value for heart failure, which might provide a valuable tool for early identification of patients with heart failure and offer timely interventions for these patients to improve their prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.