ArticleScientific reports2025
Genetic evidence from Mendelian randomization links CD40 levels to increased risk of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association betweenFrontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Roles of tumor-associated macrophages in triple-negative breast cancer progression.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study uses Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal roles of CD40 and CD40L in BC.Data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on BC (overall, ER-positive, and ER-negative subtypes) and CD40/CD40L levels were obtained from the IEU database. Causal associations were assessed using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, with additional robustness checks performed via MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode methods. Sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's Q test and MR-PRESSO, were conducted to assess heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Reverse MR analyses were also performed to examine if BC influences CD40/CD40L levels.A borderline significant association was found between CD40 levels and overall BC risk (IVW OR 1.027, 95% CI 1.000-1.054, p = 0.049), with a more robust association observed for ER-positive BC (OR 1.048, 95% CI 1.016-1.082, p = 0.003). No significant associations were found between CD40 levels and ER-negative BC. CD40L did not show any significant associations with BC. Reverse MR analysis indicated no causal effect of BC on CD40/CD40L levels. CD40 is causally associated with a borderline increase in overall BC risk and a more significant increase in ER-positive BC risk. These findings suggest a potential role for CD40 in BC, particularly in ER-positive cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.