ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on product design priority allocation based on user characteristics classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to rationally define the product usability demand preference and its priority level to improve the user experience, a product design priority allocation method based on user characteristic classification is proposed. The Pearson correlation coefficient is integrated into the finite rationality hypothesis model to classify user characteristics, and the factors influencing the phenomenon of divergence between user needs and behaviors are screened according to the Pearson correlation coefficient and used as the basis for the classification of characteristic users. Then, we constructed a product usability evaluation and analysis system mainly based on the hierarchical analysis method (AHP) from the three dimensions of product attributes, symbolic elements, and human-computer factors, and quantitatively analyzed the elements of product features, explored the priorities of different featured users for the elements of product design, and controlled the demand direction of featured users in the process of choosing and using the products, so that we could enhance the experience of product usability based on this method. This paper takes female protective clothing as an example, verifies the effectiveness of the method, and provides a product design prioritization method for female protective clothing and other product design and development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.