ArticleScientific reports2025
Chinese medical named entity recognition integrating adversarial training and feature enhancement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chinese possesses the essential attributes of unique character composition structure and the nested nature of medical entities, which causes many challenges for Chinese Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in medical named entity recognition tasks, such as scarce annotated data, strong tokenization ambiguity, and blurred entity boundaries. This increases the difficulty of extracting medical named entity categories. The paper proposes an effective Chinese clinical named entity recognition model that integrates BERT and adversarial enhancement in a dual channel architecture to address this issue. Firstly, the model integrates various advanced technologies, such as Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory networks (BiLSTM), Iterative Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (IDCNN), and Conditional Random Fields (CRF), to improve the accuracy of named entity recognition. Secondly, the paper collected texts from medical record websites and utilized the YEDDA tool for professional annotation and processing of these texts, ultimately forming a more comprehensive target dataset. This process ensures that the model is exposed to representative Chinese clinical data during training, thereby improving recognition performance.Finally, experimental results indicate that the BPBIC model achieved a precision of 93.80%, a recall of 94.44%, and an F1 score of 94.12% on the augmented dataset CCKS2019 (CCKS2019+). Moreover, through knowledge graph analysis of medical entities extracted from single and multiple disease EHRs, the model assists doctors in achieving rapid and accurate diagnoses, thereby enhancing the efficiency of healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.