ArticleScientific reports2025
Direct torque control for a six phase induction motor using a fuzzy based and sliding mode controller.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-criteria benchmarking framework for direct torque control strategies in induction motor drives.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving efficiency of SMC based IFOC drive for induction motor applying MRAS based adaptive loss model control.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct Torque Control (DTC) is widely recognized for its fast dynamic response and simplicity in controlling induction motors. However, conventional DTC suffers from drawbacks such as high torque and flux ripple, sensitivity to parameter variations, and poor performance under low-speed operation. This study proposes an enhanced DTC strategy for a modified six-phase induction motor (MSPIM) by integrating Fuzzy-Based Proportional-Integral-Derivative (FPID) control compared with conventional PID and Sliding Mode Control (SMC). The FPID, PID, and SMC controller are employed to regulate speed and flux, leveraging its adaptability and robustness to system uncertainties. The six-phase induction motor, with its inherent fault-tolerant capabilities and reduced torque pulsations, serves as an ideal candidate for high-performance applications. Results obtained using MATLAB Simulink show that the proposed control strategy significantly reduces torque and flux ripple, improves dynamic response, and enhances robustness against speed and load changing. This work highlights the potential of combining intelligent control techniques like FPID, PID and SMC to advance the performance of DTC in multi-phase induction motor drives, particularly in applications requiring high reliability and efficiency. Based on simulation results, the fuzzy PID inverter reduces the speed error and THD of the current and voltage waveforms, thereby improving MSPIM's overall performance when compared to the regular PID and SMC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.