Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295576›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Harnessing deep learning to monitor people's perceptions towards climate change on social media.

Ana Sofia Cardoso, Catarina da Silva, Andrea Soriano-Redondo, Ivan Jarić, Susana Batel, João Andrade Santos, Alípio Jorge, Ana Sofia Vaz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Sofia CardosoCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, 4485-661, Portugal. sofia.cardoso@cibio.up.pt.
Catarina da SilvaCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, 4485-661, Portugal.
Andrea Soriano-RedondoDepartamento de Anatomía, Biología Celular y Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.
Ivan JarićUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Susana BatelInstituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal.
João Andrade SantosCentre for the Research and Technology of Agroenvironmental and Biological Sciences, CITAB, Institute for Innovation, Capacity Building and Sustainability of Agri-food Production, Inov4Agro, Universidade de Trás-os_montes e Alto Douro, UTAD, Vila Real, 500-801, Portugal.
Alípio JorgeLIAAD, INESC TEC, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal.
Ana Sofia VazCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO Laboratório Associado, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, 4485-661, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/2022.06965.PTDCFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/04033/2020Ramón y Cajal fellowship RYC2023-043755-I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media has become a popular stage for people's views over climate change. Monitoring how climate change is perceived on social media is relevant for informed decision-making. This work advances the way social media users' perceptions and reactions towards climate change can be understood over time, by implementing a scalable methodological framework grounded on natural language processing. The framework was tested in over 1771 thousand X/Twitter posts of Spanish, Portuguese, and English discourses from Southwestern Europe. The employed models were successful (i.e., > 84% success rate) in detecting relevant climate change posts. The methodology detected specific climate phenomena in users' discourse, coinciding with the occurrence of major climatic events in the test area (e.g., wildfires, storms). The classification of sentiments, emotions, and irony was also efficient, with evaluation metrics ranging from 71 to 92%. Most users' reactions were neutral (> 35%) or negative (> 39%), mostly associated to sentiments of anger and sadness over climate impacts. Almost a quarter of posts showed ironic content, reflecting the common use of irony in social media communication. Our exploratory study holds potential to support climate decisions based on deep learning tools from monitoring people's perceptions towards climate issues in the online space.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDeep LearningPerceptionSocial MediaHumansEmotion analysisEnvironmental monitoringIrony detectionNatural Language processingSentiment analysisTwitter

Identifiers

PMID40295576
PMCPMC12037856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.