ArticleScientific reports2025
Designing sustainable cement free compositions with rice husk ash to improve mechanical performance in next generation ecoblocks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stabilization of compressed earth blocks using recycled thermoplastics: experimental study of key parameters.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Density-Based Topology-Optimized 3D-Printed Fixtures for Cyclic Mechanical Testing of Lattice Structures.Polymers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examines the use of low-value rice husk ash as a stabilizer to optimize the mechanical performance and strength of compressed earth blocks made with local soil from the Cauquenes Province, Chile. The use of locally sourced earth construction materials in Chile is limited by their lower compressive strength compared to conventional fired bricks, along with the demanding seismic conditions of the region. To address these limitations, this study details the methodology for collecting, preparing, and mixing raw materials to manufacture compressed earth blocks, compacted under 10 MPa using a novel cylindrical polylactic acid mold designed for miniaturized samples. Fourteen different samples representing nine mixtures of rice husk ash and soil were evaluated using an optimized experimental design. The resulting mechanical properties, including fracture analysis correlated with performance, were assessed through statistical analysis to determine the significance of the optimum mix and the observed trends in strength, modulus of elasticity, yield strength, and associated plastic work. The maximum compressive strength achieved was 3.3 MPa. Notably, the optimum mix of rice husk ash-stabilized compressed earth blocks exhibited a 60% increase in strength compared to pure soil compressed earth blocks, demonstrating the potential of rice husk ash as a cement substitute.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.