ArticleScientific reports2025
Automatic smart brain tumor classification and prediction system using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A minimal-net CNN model for an IoT-based brain tumor detection and monitoring system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Brain tumor detection with real-world predictions in Jordan hospitals.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Brain Tumor Classification in MRI Scans Using Edge Computing and a Shallow Attention-Guided CNN.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Hybrid Radiomics and Machine Learning for Brain Tumors Multi-Task Classification: An Exploratory Study on Integrating GLCM and Curvelet-Based Features for Enhanced Accuracy.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A brain tumor is a serious medical condition characterized by the abnormal growth of cells within the brain. It can cause a range of symptoms, including headaches, seizures, cognitive impairment, and changes in behavior. Brain tumors pose a significant health concern, imposing a substantial burden on patients. Timely diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and patient health. Brain tumors can be either benign or malignant, and their symptoms often overlap with those of other neurological conditions, leading to delays in diagnosis. Early detection and diagnosis allow for timely intervention, potentially preventing the tumor from reaching an advanced stage. This reduces the risk of complications and increases the rate of recovery. Early detection is also significant in the selection of the most suitable treatment. In recent years, Smart IoT devices and deep learning techniques have brought remarkable success in various medical imaging applications. This study proposes a smart monitoring system for the early and timely detection, classification, and prediction of brain tumors. The proposed research employs a custom CNN model and two pre-trained models, specifically Inception-v4 and EfficientNet-B4, for classification of brain tumor cases into ten categories: Meningioma, Pituitary, No tumor, Astrocytoma, Ependymoma, Glioblastoma, Oligodendroglioma, Medulloblastoma, Germinoma, and Schwannoma. The custom CNN model is designed specifically to focus on computational efficiency and adaptability to address the unique challenges of brain tumor classification. Its adaptability to new challenges makes it a key component in the proposed smart monitoring system for brain tumor detection. Extensive experimentation is conducted to study a diverse set of brain MRI datasets and to evaluate the performance of the developed model. The model's precision, sensitivity, accuracy, f1-score, error rate, specificity, Y-index, balanced accuracy, geometric mean, and ROC are considered as performance metrics. The average classification accuracy for CNN, Inception-v4, and EfficientNet-B4 is 97.58%, 99.56%, and 99.76%, respectively. The results demonstrate the excellent accuracy and performance of the previous proposed approaches. Furthermore, the trained models maintain accurate performance after deployment. The method predicts accuracy of 96.5% for CNN, 99.3% for Inception-v4, and 99.7% for EfficientNet-B4 on a test dataset of 1000 brain tumor images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.