Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295448›Full record

ReviewDiscover mental health2025

Liberating the mental health and wellbeing benefits of laughing alone: a new taxonomic model and scoping review for future research.

Freda Gonot-Schoupinsky, Xavier Gonot-Schoupinsky, Mark Weeks

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discover mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Freda Gonot-SchoupinskySchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health & Wellbeing, University of Bolton, Deane Road, Bolton, BL3 5 AB, UK. fng1ext@bolton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2427-6218
Xavier Gonot-Schoupinsky, Monaco, Monaco.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5444-696X
Mark WeeksInstitute of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5274-2119

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K00003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laughter has been predominantly viewed as a social behavior, and laughing alone is often regarded doubtfully, even pathologized. While solitary laughter can be symptomatic of mental health issues, one motivation of this review was to explore whether it can also offer mental health benefits. Research demonstrates that over 10% of laughter occurs in solitude and there is increasing awareness that it is not only enjoyed but can serve important roles in supporting health and wellbeing. To establish a useful foundation for further exploration of its potential in enhancing health and wellbeing, this review scopes the subject across disciplines. An unprecedented search revealed 120 records (n = 83 academic articles n = 37 literary and book references) that mention solitary laughter in meaningful ways. The Solitary Laughter Model (SLM) developed for this research supported an initial classification according to the conditions in which the laughter took place be it complete solitary, public solitary, assisted solitary, or social solitary laughter. Our research reveals that laughing alone tends to be perceived as particularly problematic when done in public. Nevertheless, we also uncovered favorable mental health perspectives on solitary laughter and recent exciting clinical applications in assisted solitary laughter. The implications of these findings are discussed. The SLM is proposed as a pragmatic model to encourage precision in this nascent field of investigation and health practice. This review concludes that solitary laughter is an important human behavior deserving more scientific investigation to further unlock its mental health and wellbeing benefits.

Indexed as

LaughterMental health and wellbeingScoping reviewSolirisySolitary laughterSolitude

Identifiers

PMID40295448
PMCPMC12037970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.