Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295444›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Applicability and results of the versius surgical robotic system in colorectal surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Stefano Gussago, Alexandre Balaphas, Emilie Liot, Guillaume Meurette, Christian Toso, Frédéric Ris, Jeremy Meyer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefano GussagoDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. stefano.gussago@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6148-3064
Alexandre BalaphasDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emilie LiotDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guillaume MeuretteDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christian TosoDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frédéric RisDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jeremy MeyerDivision of Digestive Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard of care in colorectal surgery. However, the laparoscopic approach still presents technical challenges, especially when performing intracorporeal anastomosis or total mesorectal excision. Current literature underscores the potential of robotic-assisted surgery in overcoming these challenges. Among emerging robotic platforms, the Versius Surgical Robotic System, shows promises. However, its relatively recent introduction means there is a lack of data on its performances in colorectal surgery. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current evidence on the use of Versius Surgical Robotic System in colorectal surgery. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were systematically searched for original studies reporting on the use of the Versius Surgical Robotic System for colorectal surgery. Out of 199 publications screened, nine studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative analysis. Most included studies were observational and monocentric studies, with the only large-scale, multicentric prospective data derived from the Versius surgical registry. A total of 561 colorectal procedures were reported, including oncological and benign disease, comprising 159 right hemicolectomies, 37 left colon or sigmoid resection, 253 low anterior resection and 64 abdominoperineal resections. The proportion of conversion to open surgery was 7.0% in the largest series and severe complications, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher was reported in 5.3% of cases. For right hemicolectomies, the mean operative time ranged from 160 to 221 min, with no conversion to open surgery reported and only one case requiring surgical revision. Intracorporeal anastomosis was reported in only one case. Regarding low anterior resection, the mean operative time ranged from 214 to 319 min, with a conversion rate to open of 6.9% and an incidence of severe complications of 6.0% in the largest series. Based on available literature there are no major safety concerns for the use of the Versius Surgical Robotic System for colorectal surgery. However, future well-conducted studies are needed to enable quantitative comparisons between different robotic platforms.

Indexed as

Colorectal Surgical ProceduresRobotic Surgical ProceduresColectomyConversion to Open SurgeryHumansLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsCMR SurgicalColorectal surgeryRobotic low anterior resectionRobotic right hemicolectomyVersius Surgical Robotic System

Identifiers

PMID40295444
PMCPMC12037651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.