ReviewAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
Perceiving temporal structure within and between the senses: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.
Review in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal sensitivity and perceived timing in unimodal and crossmodal isochronous sequences.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- What role does temporal synchrony play in mid-level audiovisual crossmodal correspondences?Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Influence of Live Music and Tasting Assessment on Hedonic and Emotional Responses of Wine in Public Tasting Events.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Augmenting art crossmodally: possibilities and pitfalls.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The literature demonstrates that people perceive temporal structure in sequences of auditory, tactile, or visual stimuli. However, to date, much less attention has been devoted to studying the perception of temporal structure that results from the presentation of stimuli to the chemical senses and/or crossmodally. In this review, we examine the literature on the perception of temporal features in the unisensory, multisensory and crossmodal domains in an attempt to answer, among others, the following foundational questions: Is the ability to perceive the temporal structure of stimuli demonstrated beyond the spatial senses (i.e., in the chemical senses)? Is the intriguing idea of an amodal, or supramodal, temporal processor in the human brain empirically grounded? Is the perception of temporal structure in crossmodal patterns (even) possible? Does the ability to perceive temporal patterns convey any biological advantage to humans? Overall, the reviewed literature suggests that humans perceive rhythmic structures, such as beat and metre, across audition, vision and touch, exhibiting similar behavioural traits. In contrast, only a limited number of studies have demonstrated this ability in crossmodal contexts (e.g., audiotactile interactions). Similar evidence within the chemical senses remains scarce and unconvincing, posing challenges to the concept of an amodal temporal processor and raising questions about its potential biological advantages. These limitations highlight the need for further investigation. To address these gaps, we propose several directions for future research, which may provide valuable insights into the nature and mechanisms of temporal processing across sensory modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.