ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025
Renal Arteriography and C-arm CT-Guided Ablation (RenACAGA) for Thermal Ablation of Challenging Renal Tumors.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe present a technique that combines Renal arteriography with C-arm CT-Guided Ablation (RenACAGA) to improve tumor visualization, navigation and margin confirmation for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe RenACAGA technique was used for thermal ablation of challenging renal tumors (intraparenchymal or US-occult lesions). All patients treated with RenACAGA between January 1, 2022, and July 1, 2024, were retrospectively evaluated. Procedures were performed in the angiography suite, with catheterization of the renal artery for selective contrast infusion. C-arm CT and guidance software were used for tumor visualization and ablation needle placement. Pre- and post-ablation C-arm CTs were fused to assess ablation margins. Technical success and local tumor recurrence (LTR) rate were evaluated. Complications were graded according to the Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
resultsSeven patients with 10 tumors were treated using the RenACAGA technique. All tumors were successfully identified, punctured and ablated (technical success 100%). During a median follow-up period of 8 months (range 7-25 months), no signs of tumor recurrence at the ablation site were observed (LTR rate 0%). One CTCAE grade 3 periprocedural complication was observed (urinary leakage through the needle tract), along with two CTCAE grade 1 complications (genitofemoral neuralgia (n = 1), and asymptomatic partial splenic infarction (n = 1)).
conclusionThe RenACAGA technique was successfully used for renal tumor ablation. Further studies are warranted to establish the potential benefits of this technique in terms of superior tumor visualization, targeting, ablation margin assessment, and combination with embolization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.