Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40295401›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2025

Renal Arteriography and C-arm CT-Guided Ablation (RenACAGA) for Thermal Ablation of Challenging Renal Tumors.

Maarten L J Smits, Niek Wijnen, Rutger C G Bruijnen, Willem M Brinkman, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Khalil Ramdhani, Maurits M Barendrecht, Richard Meijer, Evert-Jan P A Vonken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maarten L J SmitsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Niek WijnenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. n.wijnen-5@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1700-6930
Rutger C G BruijnenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Willem M BrinkmanDepartment of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter-Paul M WillemseDepartment of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Khalil RamdhaniDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maurits M BarendrechtDepartment of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard MeijerDepartment of Oncological Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Evert-Jan P A VonkenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe present a technique that combines Renal arteriography with C-arm CT-Guided Ablation (RenACAGA) to improve tumor visualization, navigation and margin confirmation for percutaneous ablation of renal tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe RenACAGA technique was used for thermal ablation of challenging renal tumors (intraparenchymal or US-occult lesions). All patients treated with RenACAGA between January 1, 2022, and July 1, 2024, were retrospectively evaluated. Procedures were performed in the angiography suite, with catheterization of the renal artery for selective contrast infusion. C-arm CT and guidance software were used for tumor visualization and ablation needle placement. Pre- and post-ablation C-arm CTs were fused to assess ablation margins. Technical success and local tumor recurrence (LTR) rate were evaluated. Complications were graded according to the Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

resultsSeven patients with 10 tumors were treated using the RenACAGA technique. All tumors were successfully identified, punctured and ablated (technical success 100%). During a median follow-up period of 8 months (range 7-25 months), no signs of tumor recurrence at the ablation site were observed (LTR rate 0%). One CTCAE grade 3 periprocedural complication was observed (urinary leakage through the needle tract), along with two CTCAE grade 1 complications (genitofemoral neuralgia (n = 1), and asymptomatic partial splenic infarction (n = 1)).

conclusionThe RenACAGA technique was successfully used for renal tumor ablation. Further studies are warranted to establish the potential benefits of this technique in terms of superior tumor visualization, targeting, ablation margin assessment, and combination with embolization.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesComputed Tomography AngiographyKidney NeoplasmsRadiography, InterventionalRenal ArteryAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaC-arm CTLocal tumor recurrenceMicrowave ablationRenal arteriographyRenal cell carcinomaTechnical success

Identifiers

PMID40295401
PMCPMC12170772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.