ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Evaluation of Facial Asymmetry Determined by Linear Measurements According to Hand Preference and Gender.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Dentofacial and Body Postural Asymmetries in Patients with Malocclusions-A Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Morphometric Analysis of Lateral Sulcus Asymmetry: Demographic Correlates and Neurosurgical Implications.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFacial asymmetry is a commonly observed phenomenon in human anatomy, with individuals displaying subtle variations between the left and right sides of their face. This study aimed to evaluate facial asymmetry in relation to hand preference and gender. MATERIAL AND
methodsAnthropometric facial measurements were conducted on 147 female and 150 male volunteers aged 19-42 years. Standard facial photographs taken from the front in the Frankfort horizontal plane were used to digitally perform 16 linear measurements (8 on the right side and 8 on the left side). All measurements were performed using the AutoCAD program. An asymmetry index was calculated using the (R-L)(R+L)×100. The significance of differences between means was tested to evaluate the index values according to sex and hand preference.
resultsBased on the comparison of asymmetry index values between 221 right-handed and 76 left-handed individuals, no statistically significant differences were found across all eight indices. Multiple regression analysis further confirmed that there was no significant relationship between the asymmetry index values and either gender or hand preference.
conclusionThis study contributes important evidence to the field, showing that facial asymmetry is generally independent of gender and hand preference, and that minor asymmetries are a natural part of human anatomy. Unlike earlier studies that implied stronger connections between handedness or sex and asymmetry, this research emphasizes that facial asymmetry is a stable characteristic across diverse groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.